Subscribe to RSS

18.09.2008

Are lowballers destroying the website design industry?

by Ross Allchorn

Lately I’ve had a lot of blog-worthy material rattling around in my brain. Some of which will have to wait, so I’ve filed them all under drafts in my cerebral cortex. Today however I experienced something that personally marks a point at which I believe the website design industry is starting to be irreparably damaged.

Lowballer
Someone that sells products or services for drastically less than what it’s worth.

This isn’t meant to be a rant, but more an expression of my concern over what seems to be seriously effecting the industry. Not just my pocket, but the quality of the web in general and that effects the website owners themselves. The people I affectionately call clients.

I never used to worry about lowballers much as I always gave prospects the benefit of the doubt that they’d be discerning enough to choose a website creator based on what the output is likely to be rather than solely on price.

A little cheaper or more expensive is natural but…

Sure I used to lose the odd project to a competitor who was maybe 10% or 20% cheaper than me and that didn’t phase me a bit. If someone gains a project by being cheaper… well, good for them. Now it seems as if people are bidding about a third, a quarter even a fifth of my price.

I used to pride myself on the fact that I only ever lost deals to less experienced website designers with lower prices, and I’d often be awarded projects despite the fact that my quote was higher. Not that I bid higher out of greed, but I know what it takes to design and develop an effective web presence created according to web standards and best practice. The time it takes, and the knowledge that can only be acquired through real world experience or extensive studies, or both.

I don’t deal in “cookie cutter” sites, and in my 9 years working on the web, I’ve never sold nor used a “template” (templates as in Template Monster, not Smarty Templates) in the creation of a site.

My “mate rates” are more than somes full client rates

Today I had a conversation with a client, who happens to be a good friend of mine. I gave him an exceptionally low price for my standards, but also lessened the deliverables (fewer design concepts etc.) and we got the project off to a good start. We’re on the tail end of the project now, and while we remain good buddies and we share mutual respect for each other’s professional ethics, he questioned me on my costing as he had been told that I had “ripped him a new one”.

To be honest, he was well within his rights to question me when there are people out there charging so little. He was kind enough to tell me who was so besmearing my name to him, and I went to look at their own site. I now understand why they are so cheap. Leave that be.

I managed to explain to my buddy that he has to compare apples with apples and that the quality of their work was so low and their criticisms so subjective and exposing of their lack of experience, that their criticising me is not only bad business (slinging mud), but also shows me what I have to contend with.

He chose me despite my lowest rates being higher than the competition

My friend actually told me that he chose me over them initially besides the fact that I was (much) more expensive than them. He values my experience and is aware of my successful track record. Note that they were much cheaper than my reduced price! I wouldn’t even go that low for a non-friend client, and I didn’t even make profit on the job aside from my restricted design time?! How could they make money on it cheaper than me? They live in the same country, have the same petrol price, don’t live in a shack, surely they drive cars too…

Web designers and web design shops need to look at their expenses. Rent, insurance, hardware, software, the value of their time, profit etc. Also, have some goddamn pride in your work! Learn your trade. Stop polluting the web with your crap and wasting your client’s money by “generating” rubbish that your client’s visitors laugh at and struggle to use.

Spending £200 on a website where established professionals are charging £1,500 for the same specification is more of a waste of money than spending the larger fee. At least it won’t need to be re-built a month after it’s launched, and you can rest assured that the job is done properly, your visitors can use the site, it will look good, the search engines will index you and other sites might even link to you!

Discussion (3 Comments)

  1. Jas 07/11/2008 at 11:55 am

    Ross Allchorn

    ”Are lowballers destroying the website design industry?”

    I think you are wrong and have no right to complain, lowballing can be when somebody is trying to buy for cheap, when somebody sells for cheaper you call him competition. Web designing is not what it used to be 5-10 years ago, so you need to adapt to the market and revise your pricing :). If somebody is cheaper doesnt mean work will be less in quality, dont take too much pride in your work, you are not the onlyone that can do it and not onlyone that want to make easy money.

  2. Ross Allchorn 07/11/2008 at 12:05 pm

    Ross Allchorn

    Hi Jas, thanks for your opinion. As much as I disagree with you…

    You may be correct that the term low baller is technically on the other side of the transaction, but I chose to use it in this instance and even defined the term at the top of the post.

    Yes, the business has changed, and you can do things on a smaller budget than before, but it doesn’t take away the irrefutable fact that there are a lot of people out there that are picking up Dreamweaver or Joomla or Wordpress and within a week marketing themselves as “industry leading professional web designer”, not to mention web host, domain registrar and ISP.

    They eventually fizzle out and go bankrupt, but while theyre around, they’re like a plague… always another to replace them.

    I think it’s all about educating clients, and thats that I’m trying to do on the most part. I’d be more happy to know that someone went to Hello Computer, Redshift or Wireframe over me because I believe them to be industry leaders and their choice was more likely result motivated, not the fact that it was 1 fifth of the price.

  3. Jo 07/11/2008 at 1:02 pm

    Ross Allchorn

    Great article, Ross. It’s all about value. If you win a client on price, you will inevitably lose them on price too. If you offer great value (i.e. you know your stuff, understand their requirements, etc.) and build a relationship with the client based on that, price becomes less of a factor (for intelligent clients) and they will happily pay you more than the prices the lowballers quote. You really do get what you pay for.

Post a comment

Subscribe to Comments